apply patch 9.2.0.6 on 9.2.0.1.

hpuxrac wrote:

>>> Please tell me the patch number to be applied on 9.2.0.1 to upgrade it
>>> to 9.2.0.4
>> I've heard that patch number 42 is usually the answer to all problems!
>>
>
> Not exactly a helpful reply eh?

An excellent reply. And if you don't believe me ... go to:
http://bofh.ntk.net/Bastard2.html
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan-at-x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org

Anurag Varma wrote:
> aman.oracle.dba wrote:
> > Michel Cadot wrote:
> > > "aman.oracle.dba" a écrit dans le message de news:
> > > 1167974188.705052.140810-at-s34g2000cwa.googlegroups. com...
> > > | To apply patch 9.2.0.6 on 9.2.0.1.
> > > | Do we have to apply all patches between them means 1st 9.2.0.2 then
> > > | 9.2.0.3 then 9.2.0.4 then 9.2.0.5 and then 9.2.0.6. Or can I do it
> > > | directly. on windows XP
> > > |
> > >
> > > Each patch/patchset comes with a readme file.
> > > Please read it before posting.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Michel Cadot
> > Please tell me the patch number to be applied on 9.2.0.1 to upgrade it
> > to 9.2.0.4
>
> I've heard that patch number 42 is usually the answer to all problems!
>
> Cheers
> Anurag

but only between the hours of 6 to 9.

Anurag Varma wrote:
> aman.oracle.dba wrote:
> > Michel Cadot wrote:
> > > "aman.oracle.dba" a écrit dans le message de news:
> > > 1167974188.705052.140810-at-s34g2000cwa.googlegroups. com...
> > > | To apply patch 9.2.0.6 on 9.2.0.1.
> > > | Do we have to apply all patches between them means 1st 9.2.0.2 then
> > > | 9.2.0.3 then 9.2.0.4 then 9.2.0.5 and then 9.2.0.6. Or can I do it
> > > | directly. on windows XP
> > > |
> > >
> > > Each patch/patchset comes with a readme file.
> > > Please read it before posting.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Michel Cadot
> > Please tell me the patch number to be applied on 9.2.0.1 to upgrade it
> > to 9.2.0.4
>
> I've heard that patch number 42 is usually the answer to all problems!
>
> Cheers
> Anurag

but only between the hours of 6 to 9.

Michel Cadot wrote:
> "hpuxrac" a écrit dans le message de news: 1168023509.683299.71390-at-s80g2000cwa.googlegroups.c om...
> |
>
>
>
> | Hope that helps.
> |
>
> I don't know if it helps but it surely leads/induces
> people to not make the smallest effort to find an
> answer to their question before posting.
>
> Regards
> Michel Cadot

Whatever

Michel Cadot wrote:
> "hpuxrac" a écrit dans le message de news: 1168023509.683299.71390-at-s80g2000cwa.googlegroups.c om...
> |
>
>
>
> | Hope that helps.
> |
>
> I don't know if it helps but it surely leads/induces
> people to not make the smallest effort to find an
> answer to their question before posting.
>
> Regards
> Michel Cadot

Whatever

hpuxrac wrote:

>>>> I've heard that patch number 42 is usually the answer to all problems!
>>>>
>>> Not exactly a helpful reply eh?
>> Well, the OP got the Help, the Jokes, and Everything :-)
>
> What was the joke?

Don't they learn you nothin' down there in Texas? ;-)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ans...and_Everything
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan-at-x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org

hpuxrac wrote:

>>>> I've heard that patch number 42 is usually the answer to all problems!
>>>>
>>> Not exactly a helpful reply eh?
>> Well, the OP got the Help, the Jokes, and Everything :-)
>
> What was the joke?

Don't they learn you nothin' down there in Texas? ;-)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ans...and_Everything
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan-at-x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org

"Anurag Varma" wrote in message
news:1168014584.067524.85040-at-s34g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...

aman.oracle.dba wrote:
> Michel Cadot wrote:
> > "aman.oracle.dba" a écrit dans le message de
> > news:
> > 1167974188.705052.140810-at-s34g2000cwa.googlegroups. com...
> > | To apply patch 9.2.0.6 on 9.2.0.1.
> > | Do we have to apply all patches between them means 1st 9.2.0.2 then
> > | 9.2.0.3 then 9.2.0.4 then 9.2.0.5 and then 9.2.0.6. Or can I do it
> > | directly. on windows XP
> > |
> >
> > Each patch/patchset comes with a readme file.
> > Please read it before posting.
> >
> > Regards
> > Michel Cadot
> Please tell me the patch number to be applied on 9.2.0.1 to upgrade it
> to 9.2.0.4

I've heard that patch number 42 is usually the answer to all problems!

Cheers
Anurag

http://tkyte.blogspot.com/2006/12/of...ld-be-fun.html

"Anurag Varma" wrote in message
news:1168014584.067524.85040-at-s34g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...

aman.oracle.dba wrote:
> Michel Cadot wrote:
> > "aman.oracle.dba" a écrit dans le message de
> > news:
> > 1167974188.705052.140810-at-s34g2000cwa.googlegroups. com...
> > | To apply patch 9.2.0.6 on 9.2.0.1.
> > | Do we have to apply all patches between them means 1st 9.2.0.2 then
> > | 9.2.0.3 then 9.2.0.4 then 9.2.0.5 and then 9.2.0.6. Or can I do it
> > | directly. on windows XP
> > |
> >
> > Each patch/patchset comes with a readme file.
> > Please read it before posting.
> >
> > Regards
> > Michel Cadot
> Please tell me the patch number to be applied on 9.2.0.1 to upgrade it
> to 9.2.0.4

I've heard that patch number 42 is usually the answer to all problems!

Cheers
Anurag

http://tkyte.blogspot.com/2006/12/of...ld-be-fun.html

"K. Nielsen" wrote in message
news:459ebae4$0$184$157c6196-at-dreader1.cybercity.dk ...
>
> "Anurag Varma" wrote in message
> news:1168014584.067524.85040-at-s34g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
>
> aman.oracle.dba wrote:
>> Michel Cadot wrote:
>> > "aman.oracle.dba" a écrit dans le message
>> > de news:
>> > 1167974188.705052.140810-at-s34g2000cwa.googlegroups. com...
>> > | To apply patch 9.2.0.6 on 9.2.0.1.
>> > | Do we have to apply all patches between them means 1st 9.2.0.2 then
>> > | 9.2.0.3 then 9.2.0.4 then 9.2.0.5 and then 9.2.0.6. Or can I do it
>> > | directly. on windows XP
>> > |
>> >
>> > Each patch/patchset comes with a readme file.
>> > Please read it before posting.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Michel Cadot
>> Please tell me the patch number to be applied on 9.2.0.1 to upgrade it
>> to 9.2.0.4
>
> I've heard that patch number 42 is usually the answer to all problems!
>
> Cheers
> Anurag
>

Sorry this may seem as if it came from Anurag which is not the case.
> http://tkyte.blogspot.com/2006/12/of...ld-be-fun.html
>