apply patch 9.2.0.6 on 9.2.0.1.

"K. Nielsen" wrote in message
news:459ebae4$0$184$157c6196-at-dreader1.cybercity.dk ...
>
> "Anurag Varma" wrote in message
> news:1168014584.067524.85040-at-s34g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
>
> aman.oracle.dba wrote:
>> Michel Cadot wrote:
>> > "aman.oracle.dba" a écrit dans le message
>> > de news:
>> > 1167974188.705052.140810-at-s34g2000cwa.googlegroups. com...
>> > | To apply patch 9.2.0.6 on 9.2.0.1.
>> > | Do we have to apply all patches between them means 1st 9.2.0.2 then
>> > | 9.2.0.3 then 9.2.0.4 then 9.2.0.5 and then 9.2.0.6. Or can I do it
>> > | directly. on windows XP
>> > |
>> >
>> > Each patch/patchset comes with a readme file.
>> > Please read it before posting.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Michel Cadot
>> Please tell me the patch number to be applied on 9.2.0.1 to upgrade it
>> to 9.2.0.4
>
> I've heard that patch number 42 is usually the answer to all problems!
>
> Cheers
> Anurag
>

Sorry this may seem as if it came from Anurag which is not the case.
> http://tkyte.blogspot.com/2006/12/of...ld-be-fun.html
>

DA Morgan wrote:
> hpuxrac wrote:
>
> >>>> I've heard that patch number 42 is usually the answer to all problems!
> >>>>
> >>> Not exactly a helpful reply eh?
> >> Well, the OP got the Help, the Jokes, and Everything :-)
> >
> > What was the joke?
>
> Don't they learn you nothin' down there in Texas? ;-)
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ans...and_Everything
> --
> Daniel A. Morgan
> University of Washington
> damorgan-at-x.washington.edu
> (replace x with u to respond)
> Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
> www.psoug.org

Who the **** is from Texas?

DA Morgan wrote:
> hpuxrac wrote:
>
> >>>> I've heard that patch number 42 is usually the answer to all problems!
> >>>>
> >>> Not exactly a helpful reply eh?
> >> Well, the OP got the Help, the Jokes, and Everything :-)
> >
> > What was the joke?
>
> Don't they learn you nothin' down there in Texas? ;-)
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ans...and_Everything
> --
> Daniel A. Morgan
> University of Washington
> damorgan-at-x.washington.edu
> (replace x with u to respond)
> Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
> www.psoug.org

Who the **** is from Texas?

K. Nielsen wrote:
> "K. Nielsen" wrote in message
> news:459ebae4$0$184$157c6196-at-dreader1.cybercity.dk ...
> >
> > "Anurag Varma" wrote in message
> > news:1168014584.067524.85040-at-s34g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
> >
> > aman.oracle.dba wrote:
> >> Michel Cadot wrote:
> >> > "aman.oracle.dba" a écrit dans le message
> >> > de news:
> >> > 1167974188.705052.140810-at-s34g2000cwa.googlegroups. com...
> >> > | To apply patch 9.2.0.6 on 9.2.0.1.
> >> > | Do we have to apply all patches between them means 1st 9.2.0.2 then
> >> > | 9.2.0.3 then 9.2.0.4 then 9.2.0.5 and then 9.2.0.6. Or can I do it
> >> > | directly. on windows XP
> >> > |
> >> >
> >> > Each patch/patchset comes with a readme file.
> >> > Please read it before posting.
> >> >
> >> > Regards
> >> > Michel Cadot
> >> Please tell me the patch number to be applied on 9.2.0.1 to upgrade it
> >> to 9.2.0.4
> >
> > I've heard that patch number 42 is usually the answer to all problems!
> >
> > Cheers
> > Anurag
> >
>
> Sorry this may seem as if it came from Anurag which is not the case.

Do you have anything useful to contribute to the question from the OP?

K. Nielsen wrote:
> "K. Nielsen" wrote in message
> news:459ebae4$0$184$157c6196-at-dreader1.cybercity.dk ...
> >
> > "Anurag Varma" wrote in message
> > news:1168014584.067524.85040-at-s34g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
> >
> > aman.oracle.dba wrote:
> >> Michel Cadot wrote:
> >> > "aman.oracle.dba" a écrit dans le message
> >> > de news:
> >> > 1167974188.705052.140810-at-s34g2000cwa.googlegroups. com...
> >> > | To apply patch 9.2.0.6 on 9.2.0.1.
> >> > | Do we have to apply all patches between them means 1st 9.2.0.2 then
> >> > | 9.2.0.3 then 9.2.0.4 then 9.2.0.5 and then 9.2.0.6. Or can I do it
> >> > | directly. on windows XP
> >> > |
> >> >
> >> > Each patch/patchset comes with a readme file.
> >> > Please read it before posting.
> >> >
> >> > Regards
> >> > Michel Cadot
> >> Please tell me the patch number to be applied on 9.2.0.1 to upgrade it
> >> to 9.2.0.4
> >
> > I've heard that patch number 42 is usually the answer to all problems!
> >
> > Cheers
> > Anurag
> >
>
> Sorry this may seem as if it came from Anurag which is not the case.

Do you have anything useful to contribute to the question from the OP?

Anurag Varma wrote:
> aman.oracle.dba wrote:
> > Michel Cadot wrote:
> > > "aman.oracle.dba" a écrit dans le message de news:
> > > 1167974188.705052.140810-at-s34g2000cwa.googlegroups. com...
> > > | To apply patch 9.2.0.6 on 9.2.0.1.
> > > | Do we have to apply all patches between them means 1st 9.2.0.2 then
> > > | 9.2.0.3 then 9.2.0.4 then 9.2.0.5 and then 9.2.0.6. Or can I do it
> > > | directly. on windows XP
> > > |
> > >
> > > Each patch/patchset comes with a readme file.
> > > Please read it before posting.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Michel Cadot
> > Please tell me the patch number to be applied on 9.2.0.1 to upgrade it
> > to 9.2.0.4
>
> I've heard that patch number 42 is usually the answer to all problems!
>
> Cheers
> Anurag

Isn't 42 the mauve one? )

Anurag Varma wrote:
> aman.oracle.dba wrote:
> > Michel Cadot wrote:
> > > "aman.oracle.dba" a écrit dans le message de news:
> > > 1167974188.705052.140810-at-s34g2000cwa.googlegroups. com...
> > > | To apply patch 9.2.0.6 on 9.2.0.1.
> > > | Do we have to apply all patches between them means 1st 9.2.0.2 then
> > > | 9.2.0.3 then 9.2.0.4 then 9.2.0.5 and then 9.2.0.6. Or can I do it
> > > | directly. on windows XP
> > > |
> > >
> > > Each patch/patchset comes with a readme file.
> > > Please read it before posting.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Michel Cadot
> > Please tell me the patch number to be applied on 9.2.0.1 to upgrade it
> > to 9.2.0.4
>
> I've heard that patch number 42 is usually the answer to all problems!
>
> Cheers
> Anurag

Isn't 42 the mauve one? )

"hpuxrac" wrote in message
news:1168043609.010907.167620-at-38g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...

> Do you have anything useful to contribute to the question from the OP?

Sure - what about "Who the **** is from Texas?"

"hpuxrac" wrote in message
news:1168043609.010907.167620-at-38g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...

> Do you have anything useful to contribute to the question from the OP?

Sure - what about "Who the **** is from Texas?"

"hpuxrac" wrote in
news:1168043609.010907.167620-at-38g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com:

>
> K. Nielsen wrote:
>> "K. Nielsen" wrote in message
>> news:459ebae4$0$184$157c6196-at-dreader1.cybercity.dk ...
>> >
>> > "Anurag Varma" wrote in message
>> > news:1168014584.067524.85040-at-s34g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
>> >
>> > aman.oracle.dba wrote:
>> >> Michel Cadot wrote:
>> >> > "aman.oracle.dba" a écrit dans le
>> >> > mess
> age
>> >> > de news:
>> >> > 1167974188.705052.140810-at-s34g2000cwa.googlegroups. com...
>> >> > | To apply patch 9.2.0.6 on 9.2.0.1.
>> >> > | Do we have to apply all patches between them means 1st 9.2.0.2
>> >> > | then 9.2.0.3 then 9.2.0.4 then 9.2.0.5 and then 9.2.0.6. Or
>> >> > | can I do it directly. on windows XP
>> >> > |
>> >> >
>> >> > Each patch/patchset comes with a readme file.
>> >> > Please read it before posting.
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards
>> >> > Michel Cadot
>> >> Please tell me the patch number to be applied on 9.2.0.1 to
>> >> upgrade it to 9.2.0.4
>> >
>> > I've heard that patch number 42 is usually the answer to all
>> > problems!
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> > Anurag
>> >
>>
>> Sorry this may seem as if it came from Anurag which is not the case.
>
> Do you have anything useful to contribute to the question from the OP?
>

POT<==>KETTLE<==>BLACK