Overview of Paradox database structure and architecture

"Al Breveleri" je napisal v
sporoèilo news:48999d70$1-at-pnews.thedbcommunity.com ...
>
> What an application! You are correct to be proud of it.
>
> But when are you going to upgrade it to MS Access?
>
> -Al.
>
I was never talking about moving to access (although we are M$ gold
partner).

We have a part of our team working on .NET for 3 years now.
We are still learning and discovering best ways to develop certain type of
application and are writing common parts of application (skeleton):
printing, logging, access, ...

For now we have WBT (Web Based Training) application in .NET,
which is in use with about 20 customers, it is translated to (I think) 13
languages,
and some smaller applications, which were sideproduct of .net learning.

Jure

I was attempting a humorous reference to the post that started this thread.

Note the return email address -- a common phrase meaning, "I have just made
a very bad joke." Note the use of "upgrade" to "Access" -- a snide nod to
what Mr. DiMantova's new client probably believes. Note the ...
tags --

Aw hell, I left out the ... tags. The second paragraph
should read, "But when are you going to upgrade it to MS Access?".
Sorry.

-Al.

"modri dirkac" wrote:
>"Al Breveleri" je napisal
v
>sporoèilo news:48999d70$1-at-pnews.thedbcommunity.com ...
>>
>> What an application! You are correct to be proud of it.
>>
>> But when are you going to upgrade it to MS Access?
>>
>> -Al.
>>
>I was never talking about moving to access (although we are M$ gold
>partner).
>
>We have a part of our team working on .NET for 3 years now.
>We are still learning and discovering best ways to develop certain type
of
>application and are writing common parts of application (skeleton):
>printing, logging, access, ...
>
>For now we have WBT (Web Based Training) application in .NET,
>which is in use with about 20 customers, it is translated to (I think) 13

>languages,
>and some smaller applications, which were sideproduct of .net learning.
>
>Jure
>
>