| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
|
| Hi, A server which is configured as SQL 2005 Cluster as an Active/Passive node. I have a query, if I can configure SQL 2005 Cluster as an Active/Active node with Network load balance and can use same SQL virtual IP address. I have 27 applications which connects a single Database, which is working in my Active/Passive configuration. Pls. help me if there is possibility in my scenario. Thanks & Regards, Ankur |
|
#2
|
| It doesn't work that way. Active/Active is two separate instances with completely different IP addresses and database sets. -- Geoff N. Hiten Principal SQL Infrastructure Consultant Microsoft SQL Server MVP "Ankur" news:C4D88ECA.69A%ankur.malla-at-intertecsys.com... > Hi, > > A server which is configured as SQL 2005 Cluster as an Active/Passive > node. > I have a query, if I can configure SQL 2005 Cluster as an Active/Active > node > with Network load balance and can use same SQL virtual IP address. > > I have 27 applications which connects a single Database, which is working in my > Active/Passive configuration. > > Pls. help me if there is possibility in my scenario. > > Thanks & Regards, > Ankur > > |
|
#3
|
| Cluster is not designed for load balancing. Cluster is only designed for hight availibility. And direct network load balancing between SQL Server is not a recommended .... "Ankur" news:C4D88ECA.69A%ankur.malla-at-intertecsys.com... > Hi, > > A server which is configured as SQL 2005 Cluster as an Active/Passive > node. > I have a query, if I can configure SQL 2005 Cluster as an Active/Active > node > with Network load balance and can use same SQL virtual IP address. > > I have 27 applications which connects a single Database, which is working in my > Active/Passive configuration. > > Pls. help me if there is possibility in my scenario. > > Thanks & Regards, > Ankur > > |
|
#4
|
| It's not that it's not recommended, it simply does not. Linchi "Pascal Deliot" wrote: > Cluster is not designed for load balancing. > Cluster is only designed for hight availibility. > > And direct network load balancing between SQL Server is not a recommended > ... > > "Ankur" > news:C4D88ECA.69A%ankur.malla-at-intertecsys.com... > > Hi, > > > > A server which is configured as SQL 2005 Cluster as an Active/Passive > > node. > > I have a query, if I can configure SQL 2005 Cluster as an Active/Active > > node > > with Network load balance and can use same SQL virtual IP address. > > > > I have 27 applications which connects a single Database, which is working in my > > Active/Passive configuration. > > > > Pls. help me if there is possibility in my scenario. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Ankur > > > > > |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |