| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
|
| I am doing some grouping in SQL with the grouping determined by a method call (because the grouping is user-defined and quite arbitrary). So far, so good. Are there any pitfalls that I need to watch for? I do not need to do this, but is it still dangerous to move a table pointer even if one restores it? Sincerely, Gene Wirchenko Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation: I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices. |
|
#2
|
| SQL statements should not move the record pointer of the queried tables. But if you do move a record pointer then move it back, it shouldn't change anything - EXCEPT if there's row buffering on the table and a field has changed. In that case, the changes will be automatically saved. It's rare to run a query on a buffered table, but if you do, make sure you understand WITH BUFFERING. "Gene Wirchenko" news:2gpl545cscpgqj2q3la39bo8c9us58gh89-at-4ax.com... > I am doing some grouping in SQL with the grouping determined by a > method call (because the grouping is user-defined and quite > arbitrary). So far, so good. Are there any pitfalls that I need to > watch for? > > I do not need to do this, but is it still dangerous to move a > table pointer even if one restores it? > > Sincerely, > > Gene Wirchenko > > Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation: > I have preferences. > You have biases. > He/She has prejudices. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |